We often hear the
Muslim claim that Jerusalem is their "third holiest city", after
Mecca and Medina; and specifically, that this is because our
Temple Mount is mentioned in the Koran.
As a result, Muslims are allowed sole control over our Temple
Mount - to visit it whenever they choose, to destroy priceless
archaeological relics while building additional mosques, etc. -
while Jews are only occasionally allowed to visit, and never
allowed to utter a prayer there. (Like in the old joke that ends
"...but don't let me catch you praying." Except this isn't a
joke.)
This situation has always amazed me. Even if Jerusalem and the
Temple Mount were truly the "third holiest place" for Muslims, why
should that give them more rights than Jews, for whom the Temple
Mount is our first holiest place?
But in fact, even the claim of being the "third holiest place"
is not true. It cannot possibly be true, for several very logical
reasons.
First, the claim of being "the third holiest place" is based on
a dream described in the Koran. That's right, not an actual event,
just a dream. In the dream, Mohammed "visited" a place referred to
as masjid el-aksa, which means "the farthest mosque".
The Arabs claim that this refers to their mosque of that name,
located on the Temple Mount.
But the El Aksa Mosque was built about a hundred years after
Mohammed. In Mohammed's time, Jerusalem was ruled by the Byzantine
Christians, and there were no mosques at all in Jerusalem, not on
the Temple Mount or anywhere else. So obviously, Mohammed couldn't
have dreamed about a mosque that didn't exist.
Moreover, the very name "El-Aksa" for the imaginary place
mentioned in Mohammed's dream proves that the reference could not
possibly be to Jerusalem. Because Jerusalem would never be
referred to as "the farthest place".
Jerusalem is centrally located. Within the Land of Israel, it
is located on the mountain ridge between the Jordan River and the
Mediterranean Sea. On a larger scale, it is located at the
junction point of three continents: Asia, Europe and Africa. We
see this shown in ancient maps, such as the Medeba map.
In Mohammed's time (or earlier), "the farthest place" would
never refer to Jerusalem. It would refer either to a coastal city,
such as Jaffa, Acre or Haifa, or it would refer to the end of the
Mediterranean Sea – Spain, Gibraltar or Morocco. We see this in
the book of Jonah, where the prophet attempts to flee to the end
of the earth by going to Jaffa and catching a boat headed for
"Tarshish" (usually considered to be Spain).
So, how did the tradition arise of Jerusalem's "holiness" to
Muslims?
It's very simple. It has always been a Muslim policy, when
conquering any area, to take over the holy places of the local
people and to turn them into mosques. It is a way of putting down
the conquered people – to show them that Islam will take away the
most important thing to them, and there's nothing they can do
about it.
They have done this not only in the Land of Israel, regarding
both Jewish and Christian holy places, but also in India
(regarding Hindu holy places), in Afghanistan (regarding Buddhist
holy places), etc.
So, when the Muslims conquered the Land of Israel in the 7th
century, they looked for the holiest place around, and found a
Byzantine church that was built on the Jewish Temple Mount. So
here we have a no-brainer – an opportunity to take away a holy
place from both Jews and Christians at the same time!
In addition, the Muslim ruler of the Land of Israel wasn't
happy with the fact that he was stuck with a backwater province.
So, to make it more attractive to tourists, he named the new
mosque "El-Aksa", and told all the tourists that it was the very
same one mentioned in the Koran. Voila! The birth of a
"tradition".
It would be the equivalent of Christians believing that the
founder of their religion was born in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, or
that he grew up in Nazareth, Texas. Obviously, these places are
simply named after the original Bethlehem and Nazareth; just as
El-Aksa Mosque was named after the imaginary place described in
Mohammed's dream.
It's time that more people were aware of the simple facts and
logic involved. Jerusalem and the Temple Mount are not holy to
Muslims, and never have been, except as an attempt to take them
away from the Jews.